Showcase #2 · Batch #1
Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Unruh Effect on a TFIM Lattice

Empty space looks thermal to an accelerating observer — demonstrated on a lattice vacuum.

Bisognano–Wichmann (1976) + Unruh (1976) — accelerated-observer thermality
Unruh Effect on a TFIM Lattice

The entanglement spectrum of the half-traced Transverse-Field Ising Model vacuum follows a Boltzmann distribution with R² = 0.9996 — the Bisognano–Wichmann lattice fingerprint underlying the Unruh effect.

R² = 0.9996
Boltzmann fit of the reduced-vacuum entanglement spectrum

[ overview ]

What this reproduces & why it matters

Direct experimental verification of the Unruh effect — that an accelerating observer perceives empty space as a thermal bath — requires accelerations beyond any technology humans have built. But the Bisognano–Wichmann theorem (1976) proves an operationally equivalent lattice fingerprint: the reduced state of half a QFT vacuum, when partial-traced, is approximately thermal to any observer restricted to that half.

This showcase prepares the ground state of a 4-site Transverse-Field Ising Model (h/J = 1.5, periodic boundary conditions) as a lattice regularization of the Minkowski vacuum, partial-traces over half the chain, and shows the reduced state is indistinguishable from a Gibbs thermal state to Uhlmann fidelity F = 0.9462.

[ verified results ]

Every number below is [PASS]-checked in source.

verified
TFIM vacuum prep error vs. exact diagonalization2.0 × 10⁻⁵
Boltzmann fit quality R²
exponential decay ⇒ thermal signature
0.9996
Effective inverse temperature β_eff2.565
Uhlmann fidelity vs. exact Gibbs state
94.6% indistinguishable from thermal
0.9462
ZNE R² improvement at 0.1× Heron
40-param ansatz saturates linear ZNE at real Heron scale
1.5×

[ method ]

How it's built

VQE preparation of the 4-site TFIM ground state via a 5-layer brick-layer RY–CX ansatz (40 parameters). Partial trace over qubits 2–3 yields the reduced density matrix ρ_R for the left half of the lattice. Extract its entanglement spectrum {λ_i}, plot −log(λ_i) vs. rank i, and fit a Boltzmann line to recover β_eff and the intercept.

Compare ρ_R directly against the exact Gibbs state ρ_thermal = exp(−β_eff·H_L)/Z via Uhlmann fidelity.

[ circuit ]

The actual Qiskit circuit

hardware-buildable
5-layer brick-layer RY-CX ansatz for the 4-qubit TFIM vacuum

40-parameter, 5-layer brick-layer RY–CX ansatz on 4 qubits with periodic boundary conditions — the lattice Minkowski vacuum whose half-partial-trace gives us the Unruh thermal fingerprint.

[ figures ]

Physics visuals

VQE convergence for the 4-site TFIM ground state
5-layer brick-layer VQE converges to the exact TFIM ground energy within 2 × 10⁻⁵ over 40-parameter optimization.
Direct comparison of ρ_R against the exact Gibbs state
The half-traced vacuum reduced density matrix (left) vs. the exact Gibbs state at β_eff (right). Uhlmann fidelity F = 0.9462 — the Bisognano–Wichmann prediction confirmed on a lattice.

[ mitigation ]

What Qubital's ZNE buys you here

At real Heron noise scale, the 40-parameter 5-layer ansatz accumulates enough gate error that linear ZNE saturates — an honest limit of current mitigation techniques on deeper circuits. At 0.1× Heron (representing trapped-ion / error-corrected regimes), ZNE recovers 1.5× of the R² loss. We document this saturation transparently rather than paint over it.

[ references ]

Papers & sources

  • Unruh, W. G. (1976). "Notes on Black-Hole Evaporation." Phys. Rev. D 14, 870.
  • Bisognano, J. J., Wichmann, E. H. (1976). "On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields." J. Math. Phys. 17, 303.
  • Kokail, C. et al. (2019). "Entanglement Hamiltonian Tomography in Quantum Simulation."

[ what's next ]

Roadmap for this showcase

roadmap
  • Scale to 6-site TFIM to sharpen the thermal signature
  • Test higher-order ZNE (quadratic, exponential) to lift the linear-saturation limit
  • Extend to the Rindler wedge at multiple accelerations to test the Unruh temperature scaling

[ request access ]

Want to run this yourself?

The physics-showcases repo is currently private, protecting IP pre-revenue. Physicists, quantum-industry contacts, and investors: reach out and I'll set up a technical walkthrough, call, or Loom.

Request a walkthrough